
The case involves an ATM skimming scam undertaken by three Chinese nationals, two of which are defendants in the case, causing a damage of WST 47,350.
On 24 August 2016, an employee reported suspicious activity involving the use of BSP ATM machines to Manager Retail Banking. Over 30 cards had been used and captured by ATMs at various locations of the bank. The cards were never before seen, and different from the normal ATM card in their appearance. In addition, the trial balance report for the Matautu ATM for the previous day was examined by the bank employees. They noticed a number of complete and incomplete transactions corresponding to the suspicious cards. One of the employees was instructed to check the ATM cameras and obtain video footages of the suspicious transactions. After viewing the footage, the employees contacted the police.
The police officers subsequently went to a location serving as restaurant, shop and accommodation in Matautu, where the two defendants could be identified. The police called for backup, searched the living quarters of the defendants, where – inter alia – over 100 of suspicious ATM cards and three ATM skimming machines were found and seized, and arrested the defendants.
In some of the video footages produced in evidence, a third Chinese man is participating in the commitment of the offences, who had already left the country at the time of the arrest and is not party to the proceedings.
During the search, the police found and seized over a 100 black and blue VIP ATM cards stacked in 2 or 3 bundles, 3 electronic devices (2 silver & 1 black in colour) (later identified as ATM skimming devices); 2 Yalitong universal phone & battery chargers, red tapes, 3 rolls of price tags, and torn up pieces of paper with numbers on it.
District Court of Samoa
The defendants were charged with several theft charges, one charge of intentionally accessing an electronic system without authorisation, one charge of dishonestly accessing an electronic system and thereby obtaining a benefit, and one charge of intentionally possessing a card skimming device for the purpose of committing an offence after the original charges were amended.
The defendants pled guilty to a part of the charges in the beginning of the trial. During the trial, some of the theft charges were denied, while others were fought in relation to their amount. Some of the theft charges were subsequently dismissed or reduced. Finally, the defendants were convicted of eight theft charges, one charge intentionally accessing an electronic system without authorisation, one charge of dishonestly accessing an electronic system and thereby obtaining a benefit, and one charge of intentionally possessing a card skimming device for the purpose of committing an offence.
The defendants were sentenced on 7 July 2017.
Section 161 & 165(b) of the Crimes Act 2013
Theft or stealing
Section 206 of the Crimes Act 2013
Accessing electronic system without authorisation
Section 207 and 33 of the Crimes Act 2013
Accessing electronic system for dishonest purpose
Section 213(a) and 33 of the Crimes Act 2013
Possession of illegal devices
Section 161 & 165(b) of the Crimes Act 2013
Theft or stealing
Section 206 of the Crimes Act 2013
Accessing electronic system without authorisation
Section 207 and 33 of the Crimes Act 2013
Accessing electronic system for dishonest purpose
Section 213(a) and 33 of the Crimes Act 2013
Possession of illegal devices
District Court of Samoa