Case Law Database

Money laundering

Offences

• Conversion/transfer of proceeds of crime
• Concealment/disguise of nature/ source/ location/… of proceeds of crime

Originating Offences

• Extortion

Prosecutors Office for Organized Crime vs. Omorika Ltd

Fact Summary

On 12/06/2009, the defendant Vladimir Stojanovic, as the responsible person - owner and director of the company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince, converted cash in the amount of 225,000.00 Euros in equivalent of the amount of 21,053,137.50 dinars, for which he knew originated from the commission of the criminal offence of extortion, previously committed to the detriment of injured parties Nenad Gavrilovic, Stojan Djordjevic and Srdjan Jovanovic.

With intention of concealing the origin of the money and introducing the money in legal flows, by the Decision on granting interest-free loans of the founder to its company "Omorika" Ltd, he made payment of the above mentioned amount of money on the account of his company, "Omorika" Ltd.

After that, on the same day, on the basis of the Agreement on Transfer of rights and commitments concluded on 03/06/2009  between the company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince, "Immopoint" Ltd. Belgrade and "Themelia Construction" Ltd. Belgrade, the company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince used this money  to pay part of the purchase price to the company "Immopoint" Ltd., Belgrade for a purchase of real estate located in Belgrade.

By these actions defendant Vladimir Stojanovic, as the responsible person in the company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince, used money that originated from the criminal offense of extortion, in the amount of 225,000.00 euros, to purchase real estate to his company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince, by which the company "Omorika" Ltd Vlasotince obtained benefit in the amount of 225,000.00 euros.

Commentary and Significant Features

This case is an important precedent as it involves the first conviction of a legal person in Serbia.

Sentence Date:
2014-09-23

Cross-Cutting Issues

Liability

... for

• completed offence

... based on

• criminal intention

... as involves

• legal persons
• principal offender(s)
• organiser/director

Offending

Involved Countries

Serbia

Investigation Procedure

Involved Agencies

• Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime

Confiscation and Seizure

Seized Property

Objects forfeited for the amount of 21, 053, 137, 50 dinars. 

 

Comments

Injured parties were interrogated and financial and economic expertise was ordered.

 

International Cooperation

Legal Basis

• UNTOC

Procedural Information

Legal System:
Civil Law
Latest Court Ruling:
High Court
Type of Proceeding:
Criminal
 
 

Defendants / Respondents in the first instance

Defendant:
Omorika Ltd.
Legal Reasoning:

During the trial, liability of the legal persons for the commission of the offense of money laundering was proved both by the written evidence (business documents of the company "Omorika" Ltd. Vlasotnice, Agreements concluded between the company "Omorika" Ltd. Vlasotnice and companies „ Immopoint "Ltd.," Themelia Construction ", receipts of money transfer from company " Omorika "Ltd., Contracts on compensation, bank documentation, accounts and a certificate from the Business Registers Agency) and by the testimony of witnesses - injured parties, who testified about the origin of money (225,000.00 euros), which were obtained by the defendant Vladimir Stojanovic  through commission of the criminal offense of extortion to the detriment of the aforementioned injured persons and the witness - accountant of the company "Omorika" Ltd., Momcilo Stojanovic, whose testimony was particularly significant given that he in his testimony in details described how the owner and director of the company "Omorika " put in the company the money in the amount of 225,000 euros and how the same money was used as a part of the purchase price for real estate in Belgrade.

Presented evidence proved that the owner and director of the company "Omorika" Ltd., Vladimir Stojanović, against whom a single criminal proceeding due to the crimes of extortion committed to the detriment of more persons and the criminal offense of money laundering was conducted, used this company to insert money acquired through criminal offences of extortion into legal flaws and thus obtained the benefit for his company, and through the so-called "decision on the interest-free loan to his own company" he created a legal framework for the "insertion" of money in his company, which was later, through agreements on compensation and purchase tha he  concluded with other companies, business partners, used as part of the purchase price for real estate which company "Omorika" purchased from the above mentioned companies.   

Defendant:
Vladimir Stojanovic
Gender:
Male

The Organized Crime Prosecutor's Office first indicted the natural person (responsible person in legal entity) for money laundering and then indicted the legal person for money laundering for the same event, as liability of legal person depends on culpability of its responsible person. The court decided to have joinder of both proceedings

Charges / Claims / Decisions

Defendant:
Omorika Ltd.
Statute:
Criminal CodeArticle 231, paragraph 2 in connection with paragraph 1
Charge details:
Article 231

(1) Whoever converts or transfers property while aware that such property originates
from a criminal offence, with intent to conceal or misrepresent the unlawful origin of the
property, or conceals and misrepresents facts on the property while aware that such
property originates from a criminal offence, or obtains, keeps or uses property with
foreknowledge, at the moment of receiving, that such property originates from a criminal
offence, shall be punished by imprisonment of from six months to five years and a fine.

(2) If the amount of money or property referred to in paragraphs 1 of this Article exceeds
one million five hundred thousand dinars, the offender shall be punished by
imprisonment of one to ten years and a fine.
Verdict:
Guilty
Statute:
Law on liability of legal entities for criminal offensesArticles 6, 7
Charge details:

The Grounds for Liability of Legal Entities

Article 6

A legal person shall be held accountable for criminal offences which have been committed for the benefit of the legal person by a responsible person within the remit, that is, powers thereof.

The liability referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall also exist where the lack of supervision or control by the responsible person allowed the commission of crime for the benefit of that legal person by a natural person operating under the supervision and control of the responsible person.

Limits of the Liability of Legal Entities

Article 7

Liability of legal entities shall be based upon culpability of the responsible person.

Under the conditions referred to in Article 6 of this Law, a legal person shall be held accountable for criminal offences committed by the responsible person even though criminal proceedings against the responsible person have been discontinued or the act of indictment refused.

Fine / Payment to State:
No  150000000  dinars 
Other sanctions:

The security measure of forfeiture of the objects from Article 87 of the  Criminal Code, the money in the amount of 21,053,137, 50 dinars, within 15 days of the final judgment and the costs of the criminal proceedings.

Defendant:
Vladimir Stojanovic

Court

High Court in Belgrade - Special department