判例法数据库

贩运枪支

罪行

• 非法贩运

贩运细节

• 未经许可进口、出口、获取、销售、交付、运送或转移枪支及其零部件或弹药

项目类别

• 枪支
• 爆炸物
• 弹药

关键字

• 进口/出口/转运许可

恐怖主義

罪行

• 与恐怖主义爆炸有关的罪行

涉及行为

• 犯罪团伙
• 计划或准备恐怖主义的行为

关键词

• 炸弹 / 简易爆炸装置(IED)/ 爆炸物

Decision 1A-133-658/2023 of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania

事实梗概

Two Irish citizens were accused by Lithuanian law enforcement of making arrangements to acquire firearms and explosives in Lithuania between November 2006 and January 2007, and attempting to smuggle them back to Ireland to support the Real IRA, classified as a terrorist group by Lithuania.

Irish courts had previously in 2013 refused to extradite the defendants on the grounds that they were likely to be held in inhuman and degrading conditions if extradited to Lithuania. After a second European Arrest Warrant was issued by the Baltic State, they were arrested and extradited in 2022 following a lengthy legal battle.

However, the charges were dropped by the Vilnius Regional Court, on the grounds that the statute of limitations precluded criminal proceedings in this case. The prosecution appealed the decision, stating that the statute of limitation to be applied in this case was 15 years, which was the law in effect when the offence was committed, and not 10 years, which was a change to the criminal law brought in after the perpetration of the offence.

The lower court’s decision was nevertheless upheld by the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, who provided that the 10 years statute of limitation applied in this case, as it was the most favourable to the accused.

评注和重要特点

This case exemplifies how statutes of limitation can act as a possible limit for the prosecution of firearms offences, as criminal proceedings can only be initiated against a defendant during a certain amount of time after the offence was committed.

判决日期:
2023-01-20

交叉问题

犯罪

详情

• 捲入到有组织犯罪集团 (第 2 条(a) CTOC)

责任

... 为了

• 既遂犯罪

... 根据

• 犯罪意图

... 作为涉及方

• 主犯

起诉、审判和制裁

审判前的问题

• 检察官的自由裁量权

程序步骤

法律制度:
民法
最新的法院:
上诉法院
诉讼类型:
刑事的
 
诉讼 #1:
  • 阶段:
    上诉
  • 官方案件编号:
    Decision 1A-133-658/2023 of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania
  • 裁决日期:
    Fri Jan 20 00:00:00 CET 2023

    法院

    法院名称

    Court of Appeal of Lithuania
     
    • 刑事的

    说明

    The lower court’s decision was upheld by the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, who provided that the 10 years statute of limitation applied in this case, as it was the most favourable to the accused.

     

    结果

  • 陪审团裁决:
    撤回
  • 被告/ 初审被申请人

    被告:
    A. B.
    性别:
    被告:
    S. T.
    性别:

    指控/索赔/裁决

    被告:
    A. B.
    立法/法规/法典:
     Articles 25(3), 22(1) and 250(4) of the Criminal Code
    指控详情:

    obtaining assets in support of an organised criminal group engaging in terrorist activities

    The defendant made arrangements to acquire firearms and explosives in Lithuania between November 2006 and January 2007, and attempted to smuggle them back to Ireland to support the real IRA, a group classified as a terrorist organisation by Lithuania.

    陪审团裁决:
    Withdrawn
    被告:
    S. T.
    立法/法规/法典:
    Articles 25(3), 22(1) and 250(4) of the Criminal Code
    指控详情:

    obtaining assets in support of an organised criminal group engaging in terrorist activities

    The defendant made arrangements to acquire firearms and explosives in Lithuania between November 2006 and January 2007, and attempted to smuggle them back to Ireland to support the real IRA, a group classified as a terrorist organisation by Lithuania.

    陪审团裁决:
    Withdrawn

    法院

    Court of Appeal of Lithuania