From early 2007 on, the defendant maritally lived with a Turkish individual who had entered and stayed in France irregularly. The couple lived Nimes (France), having eventually married at the end of November 2007.
Legal findings:
The defendant was charged by the Prosecution with migrant smuggling, in the modality of “assisting the irregular entry, transit or stay of a foreigner in France”. The Court acquitted the defendant.
For further details see “Commentary”.
评注和重要特点
The Court of Lyon determined that, in view of the specific circumstances of the case, the defendant benefited from the familiar immunity enshrined in Article L 622-4 Code of entry and stay of foreigners and right of asylum - “Code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile (CESEDA)”.
In the terms of the said legal provision, there are a number of individuals who are exempted from criminal prosecution if they “facilitate the irregular stay of foreigners in France”. Such persons include the spouse and the person with whom the foreigner notoriously lives in a marital situation.
Accordingly, the Court of Lyon acquitted the defendant.
NOTE: As per French national law, the purpose of obtaining a financial or other material benefit is not a constitutive element of the crime but rather an aggravating circumstance (see SHERLOC Database on Legislation – France).
判决日期:
2008-03-18
交叉问题
责任
... 为了
• 既遂犯罪
... 根据
• 犯罪意图
... 作为涉及方
• 主犯
侦查
所涉机构
• Criminal police
• Public Prosecutor
性别平等方面的考虑因素
详情
• 性别考虑
• 女性主犯
程序步骤
法律制度:
民法
最新的法院:
初审法院
诉讼类型:
刑事的
The defendant was first questioned on 14 November 2007.
被告/ 初审被申请人
被告:
X.
性别:
女
指控/索赔/裁决
被告:
X.
指控:
Assisting the irregular entry, transit or stay of a foreigner in France
法规:
Code of entry and stay of foreigners and right of asylum - “Code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile (CESEDA)”Articles L 622-1 and L 622-3
陪审团裁决:
Not Guilty
法院
Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon
来源/引文
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Lyon Jugement Nº 2394.6EME C 18 March 2008
