判例法数据库

贩运人口

John Doe v. Moises Rodriguez

事实梗概

Defendants contracted with smugglers to bring Plaintiffs across the US-Mexico border in order to work on their farms in Colorado.  When they reached their living quarters, the "compound," the Plaintiffs were informed that they owed a debt of $1300 to the Defendants for their transportation costs.  In Colorado, Plaintiffs lived 4-6 to a room, and some people were forced to sleep on the floor each night.  The water on the compound was undrinkable.  The bathrooms and showers were grossly inadequate and the entire compound was infested with insects.
The farms on which Plaintiffs worked were 60 to 90 minutes away from the compound.  Between traveling and working on the crops, Plaintiffs were on duty for over 16 hours, 6 or 7 days a week.  Plaintiffs believed that they would be found and harmed if they left the Defendants' company; they also believed that if they left, their co-workers would be forced to pay off their debts.  Defendants also brought guns to work, and at least once, fired the gun to prove that it worked.  Defendants were insulting, threatening and harmful to Plaintiffs, in order to keep them in fear.
Plaintiffs were paid once a month, and their pay was reduced through a variety of illegal deductions for rent, cleaning, tools, travel, the repayment of the smuggling fee, etc.  Social Security was also deducted, fraudulently, since none of the Plaintiffs had Social Security numbers.  The number of hours each Plaintiff worked was rounded down--with many days clocking in at exactly 12 hours.
In October of 2005, Plaintiffs escaped from the Defendants and started this action.  In 2009, the court entered a default judgment for Plaintiffs.

作者:
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School

关键词

法令:
招募
运输
转移
包庇
接收
途径:
滥用职权或脆弱境况
剥削目的:
强迫劳动或服务
贩运形式:
跨国
剥削发生的部门:
农业
乞讨
建筑
商业化性剥削

交叉问题

性别平等方面的考虑因素

详情

• 女性主犯

程序步骤

法律制度:
习惯法
最新的法院:
初审法院
诉讼类型:
民事的
 

受害人/初审原告

原告:
5 Individuals
性别:
国籍:

被告/ 初审被申请人

被申请人:
Moises Rodriguez
性别:
法律推理:

The defendant was found liable for all claims under the statutes.

被申请人:
Maria Rodriguez
性别:
法律推理:

The defendant was found liable for all claims under the statutes.

被申请人:
Andrew L. Grant
性别:
法律推理:

The defendant was found liable for all claims under the statutes.

被申请人:
Grant Family Farms. Inc
法律推理:

The defendant was found liable for all claims under the statute.

指控/索赔/裁决

被申请人:
Moises Rodriguez
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 206

指控详情:
Fair Labour Standards Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 1821

指控详情:
Migrant and Seasonal Workers Protection Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

18 USC 1589

指控详情:
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) Violations - Trafficking Victims Protection Act Violations
被申请人:
Maria Rodriguez
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 206

指控详情:
Fair Labour Standards Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 1821

指控详情:
Migrant and Seasonal Workers Protection Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

18 USC 1589

指控详情:
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) Violations - Trafficking Victims Protection Act Violations
被申请人:
Andrew L. Grant
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 206

指控详情:
Fair Labour Standards Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 1821

指控详情:
Migrant and Seasonal Workers Protection Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

18 USC 1589

指控详情:
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) Violations - Trafficking Victims Protection Act Violations
被申请人:
Grant Family Farms. Inc
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 206

指控详情:
Fair Labour Standards Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

29 USC 1821

指控详情:
Migrant and Seasonal Workers Protection Act Violations
立法/法规/法典:

18 USC 1589

指控详情:
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) Violations - Trafficking Victims Protection Act Violations

法院

United States District Court for the District of Colorado