Case Law Database

Piracy and Maritime crime

Keywords

• Maritime security
• Law of the Sea
• Maritime Crime

Terrorism

Offences

• Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation/ Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf

Keywords

• Maritime Navigation / Fixed Platforms / Cargo Container / Ship

The Arctic Sunrise Case (The Netherlands v Russia)

Fact Summary

On 18 September 2013, using the vessel Arctic Sunrise, Greenpeace activists tried to access the Prirazlomnaya oil rig, which was operating within the Russian Federation‟s exclusive economic zone in the Pechora Sea between the Russian mainland and Novaya Zemlya. The following day the Russian authorities boarded and arrested the Arctic Sunrise vessel and detained its crew. The vessel and crew were subsequently transferred to the Russian port of Murmansk and the crew was charged initially with piracy and later with hooliganism. The Netherlands claimed that Russia had no right to violate the exclusive flag state jurisdiction they held over the Arctic Sunrise and instituted proceedings for, among other things, the prompt release of the vessel and her crew until and Annex VII arbitral tribunal could determine the questions regarding the lawfulness of Russia’s exercise of jurisdiction.

Commentary and Significant Features

This case demonstrates how seriously ITLOS takes the issue of flag state jurisdiction.

Sentence Date:
2013-11-22

Procedural Information

Legal System:
Mixed System
Latest Court Ruling:
International Court / Treaty Body
Type of Proceeding:
International
 
Proceeding #1:
  • Stage:
    Other
  • Details:
    Provisional Measures
  • Official Case Reference:
    ITLOS Case No. 22 (Provisional Measures)
  • Court

    Court Title

    International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

     
    • International

    Description

    In response to the detention of the Arctic Sunrise and her crew by Russia without the authority of the Netherlands (as flag state), the Netherlands requested the prompt release of the vessel and her crew as a provisional measure to their Annex VII arbitral tribunal proceedings to address the lawfulness of Russia’s exercise of jurisdiction. ITLOS supported their request for provisional measures, ordering that the vessel and her crew be release and that the Netherlands post a bond of 3,600,000 Euros via bank guarantee pending the outcome of the Annex VII arbitral tribunal findings.

     

    Outcome

  • Verdict:
    Other
  • Other Outcome

    Prompt release of the vessel and her crew was ordered.

     

    Victims / Plaintiffs in the first instance

    Plaintiff:
    The Kingdom of the Netherlands
    Nationality:
    Netherlander

    Defendants / Respondents in the first instance

    Respondent:
    The Russian Federation
    Nationality:
    Russian

    Court

    International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    Sources / Citations

     https://www.itlos.org/en/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-22/