Case Law Database

Trafficking in persons

United States v. Derek Roberts

Fact Summary

According to facts presented in the appellate record, in March 2004, Derek Roberts booked a trip with Costa Rica Taboo Vacations, a fake travel agency set up by federal law enforcement to catch U.S. citizens traveling abroad for the purposes of engaging in commercial sex with minors. The fake agency offered the services of "tourist companions" as young as 14-years old. The defendant booked and paid for a trip with the agency, including arrangements to engage in sex with underage girls. He eventually cancelled the trip; however, he did arrange to meet with underage Costa Rican girls at a hotel in Miami. Roberts was arrested when he arrived at the hotel. Roberts was convicted by a federal jury of attempting to exploit a minor for commercial sex, and was sentenced to 37 months imprisonment.

Sentence Date:
2005-04-04
Author:
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School

Keywords

Purpose of Exploitation:
Exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation
Sector in which exploitation takes place:
Commercial sexual exploitation

Procedural Information

Legal System:
Common Law
Latest Court Ruling:
Court of 1st Instance
Type of Proceeding:
Criminal
 

Victims / Plaintiffs in the first instance

Victim:
Anonymous 1
Victim:
Anonymous 2
Victim:
Anonymous 3

Defendants / Respondents in the first instance

Defendant:
Derek Roberts
Gender:
Male

Charges / Claims / Decisions

Defendant:
Derek Roberts
Legislation / Statute / Code:
18 U.S.C. § 1594 (a)
Charge details:
Attempt to exploit a minor for commercial sex
Verdict:
Guilty
Charge details:
Attempting to induce a minor to engage in prostitution
Verdict:
Not Guilty
Term of Imprisonment:
3 years 1 Month
With an additional 3 years of supervised release
Fine / Payment to State:
Yes  100  USD  (Up to 10,000 USD) Special assessment
Appellate Decision:
Upheld

First, Roberts argued that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a bill of particulars as to how his offense conduct affected interstate commerce because that element was alleged too generally in the indictment to adequately advise him of the charges he faced. Second, he argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove that his offense affected interstate commerce. Third, he contended that the district court erred in not granting his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the basis that he was entrapped as a matter of law. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit did not find merit in these arguments and affirmed the judgment of the district court in 2006.

Court

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Sources / Citations

http://www.law.umich.edu/clinical/HuTrafficCases/Pages/CaseDisp.aspx?caseID=145

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/05-12217/200512217-2011-02-28.html