Case Law Database

Trafficking in persons

Offences

• Trafficking in persons (adults)

Acts Involved

• Recruitment/Hiring
• Transportation
• Receipt

Means Used

• Threat of the use of force or of other forms of coercion
• Fraud
• Deception
• Abuse of power or a position of vulnerability

Exploitative Purposes

• Exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation

Keywords

• Exploitation

S v. Jonas (CC14/2017)

Fact Summary

The defendant was charged with 3 counts of Trafficking in Persons and 5 counts of Rape. It was alleged that the defendant recruited the victim by means of coercion, deception, abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability with the intent to sexually exploit her. It was also alleged that the defendant coerced the victim to commit sexual acts with various men.

 

In May 2012, the defendant approached the victim at Okahenge village and told the victim that she should leave school because the defendant got a job for her in Okahandja. The victim is an orphan, but her mother was the half-sister of the defendant’s mother. The victim believed the defendant and agreed to travel Okahandja. The defendant gave the victim N$200 for travel expenses which was to be repaid once the victim starts working.

 

When the victim arrived at the Okahandja service station, the defendant fetched her and brought her to the farm where the defendant was staying and where the victim was supposed to work. The defendant then told the victim that there was no job for her, but a man called Johnny paid for her travel and she must live with him. The defendant threatened the victim that if she does not stay with Johnny, she must find another place to stay. The defendant also threatened and forced the victim to have sex with Johnny. The victim stayed with Johnny for two and a half months during which he had sexual intercourse with the victim nightly. Within that period, Johnny gave the defendant 10kg of sugar and meat.

 

After a misunderstanding between Johnny and the victim, the defendant told the victim to leave Johnny. The victim stayed with the defendant who promised to find her a job. After one month, the defendant told the victim to stay with another man, Phillip, who gave the defendant carrots and meat. Phillip attempted to have sexual intercourse with the victim, but the victim ran back to the defendant’s place. A few days later, the defendant threw the victim out of her place and forced her to stay in the place of another man named Nico. Nico told the victim that she was now his wife  but he will not give her money because he is giving it to the defendant. Nico had sexual intercourse with the victim several times. 

Commentary and Significant Features

The Court made explicit reference to the UN Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children in interpreting and applying the law to the case, particularly in paragraphs [57] and [58].

Sentence Date:
2019-07-31
Author:
Angeli Patricia Romero, as part of collaboration with Queen Mary University London

Keywords

Acts:
Recruitment
Transportation
Receipt
Means:
Threat or use of force or other forms of coercion
Fraud
Deception
Abuse of power or a position of vulnerability
Purpose of Exploitation:
Exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation

Cross-Cutting Issues

Liability

... for

• completed offence

... based on

• criminal intention

... as involves

• principal offender(s)

Offending

Involved Countries

Namibia

Gender Equality Considerations

Details

• Gender considerations

Procedural Information

Legal System:
Mixed System
Latest Court Ruling:
High Court
Type of Proceeding:
Criminal
 
Proceeding #1:
  • Stage:
    first trial
  • Official Case Reference:
    CC 14/2017 [2019] NAHCMD 262
  • Court

    Court Title

    High Court of Namibia Main Division
     

    Location

  • City/Town:
    Windhoek
  • • Criminal

    Description

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to an indictment containing 3 counts of Trafficking in Persons and 5 counts of Rape.
    The case was heard on 4-14 June 2018, 23 March 2019, 24 April 2019, 27 May 2019 and 10 June 2019. Judgment was delivered on 31 July 2019.
    The Court found in favour of the victim, who testified that she was approached by the defendant promising her employment in Okahandja. The Court found supporting evidence from three other young women corroborating the victim’s version that the defendant was on a mission and approached young girls either to become girlfriends to her male friends who were in Okahandja or promising them jobs.
    The Court held that the defendant only offered bare denials and was not a truthful witness as there was overwhelming evidence that the defendant used the same modus operandi to recruit her victims.
     

    Outcome

  • Verdict:
    Guilty
  • Victims / Plaintiffs in the first instance

    Gender:
    Female
    Nationality:
    Namibian

    Defendants / Respondents in the first instance

    Number of other accused:
    1
    Defendant:
    Tuufilwa Ndawina Jonas
    Gender:
    Male
    Nationality:
    Namibian
    Age:
    34
    Legal Reasoning:
    With respect to the Trafficking in Persons charges, the Court held that:
    The defendant recruited, transferred and received the victim by means of fraud, deception, the abuse of power or position of vulnerability. It was established that victim was an 18 year old orphan who came from an under privileged home. The Court found that because of the victim’s position of vulnerability, the defendant promised her a job although she had no intention of providing her with a job. The entire purpose of recruiting the victim was to facilitate her sexual exploitation. The defendant received and gave the victim N$200 to travel. Section 15 of POCA makes it an offence for anyone to participate in or to aid and abet the trafficking of persons in Namibia as contemplated in Article 3 of Annex II of the UN Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime. Annex II (b) of the Convention states that the consent of a victim of trafficking in persons to the intended exploitation set forth in subparagraph (a) is irrelevant where the means set forth in subparagraph (a) have been used. The defendant employed some of the means mentioned in subparagraph (a) of Article 3 of Annex II. She recruited and facilitated the transportation of the victim; she received the victim through fraud or deception; she abused the vulnerability of the victim, and she received payments or benefits to achieve the consent of the victim for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
     
    The Court found that the defendant approached the victim and other young ladies and offered them to go to Okahandja to be her male friends’ girlfriends. After the offer was declined, the defendant tricked them by telling them that she would get them employment. This trick can also be confirmed by the evidence that when the defendant gave N$200 to the victim, she told her that she would have to refund it once she starts working. However, when the victim arrived in Okahandja she was told by the defendant that the money she used for transport was paid by Johnny and that she must stay with Johnny. After she left Johnny, the victim was given to Phillip by the defendant in exchange for carrots and meat. After Phillip, she was given to Nico who gave the defendant the head of a warthog.
     
    With respect to the Rape charges, the Court held that:
    Although the defendant herself did not have sexual intercourse with the victim, section 2 (1) (b) of the Combating of Rape Act makes it an offence if any person intentionally under coercive circumstances causes any person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person. The defendant coerced the victim to have sexual intercourse with one Johnny by threatening her to remain without shelter in circumstances where the defendant knew very well that the victim was a stranger at the farm. The only person at the farm she knew at the time was the defendant. The money that she paid for her transportation to Okahandja was used as a means to threaten her and to forcibly induce her to have sexual intercourse with a stranger against her will. The victim was in a state of helplessness to such an extent that she was deprived of the opportunity to communicate her unwillingness to submit or to commit the sexual act with Johnny. The Court is satisfied that the defendant caused Johnny, and subsequently Nico, to have sexual intercourse with the victim on divers occasions.

    Charges / Claims / Decisions

    Defendant:
    Tuufilwa Ndawina Jonas
    Charge:

    3 counts of Trafficking in Persons

    (Counts 1, 4, 6)
    Legislation / Statute / Code:
    Section 15 read with section 1 of the Prevention of Organized Crime Act 29 of 2004 (POCA). 

    Section 15 of the POCA:  Any person who participates in or who aids and abets the trafficking in persons, as contemplated in Annex II of the Convention, in Namibia or across the border to and from foreign countries commits an offence and is liable to a fine not exceeding N$1 000 000 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 50 years.

     

    Section 1 of the POCA defines Trafficking in Persons as:

    The recruitment, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation and includes any attempt, participation or organising of any of these actions. Exploitation includes, at a minimum, the exploitation or the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

    *source: Sherloc database

    https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/legislation/nam/prevention_of_organised_crime_act_2004/chapter_4/section_15/section_15.html?lng=en

    Verdict:
    Guilty
    Legislation / Statute / Code:
    Section 2(1)(b) as read with sections 1, 2(2), 3, 5, 6 and 18 of the Combatting of Rape Act 8 of 2000 (CORA)

    Section 2(1)(b) of the CORA:

    Any person (in this Act referred to as a perpetrator) who intentionally under coercive circumstances causes another person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person, shall be guilty of the offence of rape.

    Sections 1, 2(2), 3, 5, 6 and 18 of the CORA:

    1: Definitions

    2(2): Coercive Circumstances

    3: Penalties

    5: Abolition of cautionary rule relating to offences of a sexual or indecent nature

    6: Evidence of previous consistent statements

    18: Insertion of section 227A in Act 51 of 1977

    *source: Namibia Legal Information Institute https://namiblii.org/akn/na/act/2000/8

     

    Section 2(1)(b) of the CORA:

    Any person (in this Act referred to as a perpetrator) who intentionally under coercive circumstances causes another person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person, shall be guilty of the offence of rape.

     

    Sections 1, 2(2), 3, 5, 6 and 18 of the CORA:

    1: Definitions

    2(2): Coercive Circumstances

    3: Penalties

    5: Abolition of cautionary rule relating to offences of a sexual or indecent nature

    6: Evidence of previous consistent statements

    18: Insertion of section 227A in Act 51 of 1977

     

    *source: Namibia Legal Information Institute https://namiblii.org/akn/na/act/2000/8

     

    Charge details:
    Rape
    Verdict:
    Guilty
    Legislation / Statute / Code:
    Section 2(1) (b) as read with sections 1, 2(2), 3, 5, 6 and 18 of Act 8 of 2000, further read with section 18 (1) of the Riotous Assemblies Act 17 of 1956.

    Section 2(1)(b) of the CORA:

    Any person (in this Act referred to as a perpetrator) who intentionally under coercive circumstances causes another person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person, shall be guilty of the offence of rape.

     

    Section 18(1) of the Riotous Assemblies Act:

    Any person who attempts to commit any offence against a statute or a statutory regulation shall be guilty of an offence and, if no punishment is expressly provided thereby for such an attempt, be liable on conviction to the punishment to which a person convicted of actually committing that offence would be liable.

     

    *source: Namibia Legal Information Institute

    https://namiblii.org/akn/na/act/1956/17

    Charge details:
    Rape
    Verdict:
    Not Guilty
    Legislation / Statute / Code:
    Section 2 (1) (b) as read with section 1, 2(2), 3, 5, 6 and 18 of Act 8 of 2000

    Section 2(1)(b) of the CORA:

    Any person (in this Act referred to as a perpetrator) who intentionally under coercive circumstances causes another person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person, shall be guilty of the offence of rape.

    Charge details:
    Rape
    Verdict:
    Acquittal
    Legislation / Statute / Code:
    Section 2(1) (b), read with sections 1, 2(2), 2(3) 3,5,6,7 and 18 of Act 8 of 2000, further read with section 94 of the CPA 51 of 1977

    Section 2(1)(b) of the CORA:

    Any person (in this Act referred to as a perpetrator) who intentionally under coercive circumstances causes another person to commit a sexual act with the perpetrator or with a third person, shall be guilty of the offence of rape.

    S 94 of the CPA: Where it is alleged that an accused on divers occasions during any period committed an offence in respect of any particular person the accused may be charged in one charge with the commission of that offence on divers occasions during the stated period.

    Charge details:
    Rape
    Verdict:
    Guilty

    Court

    High Court of Namibia Main Division