During a police control on the highway, in Saint Avold (France), on 11 December 1988, authorities stopped the appellant. It was ascertained that he transported in the car his mother-in-law, Algerian, who’s passport had expired six months prior.
The appellant confirmed to be aware of the irregular situation of his mother-in-law in France. He further acknowledged accommodating her. He justified his conduct with her debilitated health condition (diabetes and high blood pressure), which required her to be closely followed by a physician.
Legal findings:
The Court of First Instance of Sarreguemines (France) convicted the appellant of migrant smuggling, specifically facilitation of illegal stay. It sentenced the appellant to two months imprisonment suspended and a fine of 2000 Francs. The Court of Appeal of Metz (France) confirmed the decision on the merits but reviewed the penalty applied.
For further details see “History of Proceedings” and “Commentary”.
Comentario y aspectos destacados
The Court of Appeal of Metz (France) confirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Sarreguemines (France), thus convicting the appellant of migrant smuggling, in its modality of facilitation of illegal stay. In so doing, the Court considered that the appellant was aware of the irregular situation of his mother-in-law. By proving accommodation to her, he facilitated her illegal stay in the country, in the terms of Article 21 Ordonnance 45-2658 of 2 November 1945.
However, the Court of Appeal paid due care to the particular circumstances of the case and the special needs of the migrant. It thus reviewed the penalty by applying a full suspension thereof. That is, contrarily to the decision of he Court of First Instance of Serreguemines, the Court of Appeal suspended the execution of the fine (and not only of the imprisonment).
NOTE: As per French national law, the purpose of obtaining a financial or other material benefit is not a constitutive element of the crime but rather an aggravating circumstance (see SHERLOC Database on Legislation – France).
Fecha de la Sentencia:
1989-10-04
Cuestiones transversales
Responsabilidad
Responsabilidad por
• Delito consumado
Base de responsabilidad
• Intención dolosa
Responsabilidad implica
• Delincuentes principales
Investigación
Organismos interesados
• Criminal Police
• Public Prosecutor
Información sobre el procedimiento
Sistema jurídico:
Derecho continental
Última sentencia judicial:
Tribunal de apelación
Tipo de Proceso:
Penal
On 19 May 1989, the Court of First Instance of Sarreguemines (France) convicted the appellant of migrant smuggling. It followed the appeal herein under analysis.
Migrantes
Inmigrante:
Sexo:
Mujer
Nacionalidad:
argelino
Mother-in-law of the appellant. Debilitated health condition, requiring close medical follow-up.
Acusado / Demandado de primera instancia
Acusado:
M.D.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
argelino
Nacimiento:
1957
Razonamiento jurídico:
On appeal, the Defence argued the appellant had acted out of concern for the debilitated health of his mother-in-law who required close medical follow-up.
Cargos/Acusaciones/Decisiones
Acusado:
M.D.
Acusación:
Assisting the irregular entry, transit or stay of a foreigner in France
Ley:
Ordonnance 45-2658 of 2 November 1945Article 21
Veredicto:
Guilty
Pena de prisión:
2 Meses
Probation
Multa/Pago al Estado:
2000
Francs
(Up to 10,000 USD)
Execution suspended
Tribunal
Cour d'appel de Metz
Fuentes/Citas
Cour d’Appel de Metz Jugement 767/89 4 October 1989
