De Meyer, Jan. (1973). The Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Home, and Communications in relations between individuals, and the Resulting Obligations for States Parties to the Convention. In A. H. Robertson, ed. Privacy and Human Rights. Manchester University Press.
Douglas, Karen M., and Craig McGarty. (2001). Identifiability and Self-Presentation: Computer-Mediated Communication and Intergroup Interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40(3), 399-416.
Eissen, Marc-Andre. (1967). La protection internationale des droits de l'homme dans le cadre Européen. Dalloz.
Greenleaf, Graham. (2011). The Influence of European Data Privacy Standards Outside Europe: Implications for Globalisation of Convention 108. International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 2(2), 68-92.
Haines, Russell, Hough, Jill, Cao, Lan, and Douglas Haines. (2014). Anonymity in computer-mediated communication: More contrarian ideas with less influence . GroupDecision and Negotiation, Vol. 23(4), 765-786.
Janis, Mark, Richard Kay, and Anthony Bradley. (2000). European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials, 2 nd edition. Oxford University Press.
Koops Bert-Jaap, Bryce Clayton Newell, Tjerk Timan, Ivan Škorvánek, Tomislav Chokrevski, and Maša Galič. (2017). A typology of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 38(2), 483-575.
Makulilo, Alex Boniface. (2013a). Data Protection Regimes in Africa: too far from the European 'adequacy' standard? International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 3(1), 42-50.
Makulilo, Alex Boniface. (2013b). Mauritius Data Protection Commission: an analysis of its early decisions. International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 3(2), 131-139.
Maras, Marie-Helen. (2016). Cybercriminology. Oxford University Press.
Maras, Marie-Helen. (2009). From Targeted to Mass Surveillance: Is the EU Data Retention Directive a Necessary Measure or an Unjustified Threat to Privacy? In Ben Goold and Daniel Neyland, eds. New Directions in Surveillance and Privacy (pp. 74-103). Willan.
Maras, Marie-Helen.(2014). Inside Darknet: The Takedown of Silk Road. Criminal Justice Matters, Vol. 98(1), 22-23.
Maras, Marie-Helen. (2015). The Internet of Things: Security and Privacy Implications. International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 5(2), 99-104.
Maras, Marie-Helen. (2012). The Social Consequences of a Mass Surveillance Measure: What Happens When We Become the "Others"? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, Vol. 40(2), 65-81.
Maras, Marie-Helen and Wandt, Adam. (2019). Enabling Mass Surveillance: Data Aggregation in the Age of Big Data and the Internet of Things. Journal of Cyber Policy.
Maras, Marie-Helen and Wandt, Adam. (2018). IoT Data Collection and Analytics. Presentation for FBI, DHS, and Secret Service agents and members of the National Cyber-Forensics & Training Alliance, at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York (2 de mayo de 2018).
Orji, Uchenna Jerome. (2017). Regionalizing data protection law: a discourse on the status and implementation of the ECOWAS Data Protection Act. International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 7(3), 179-189.
Shultztiner, Doron and Guy E. Carmi. (2014). Human Dignity in National Constitutions: Functions, Promises and Dangers. The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 62(2), 461-490.
Tan, Lara. (2016). 55M Filipino voters open to fraud after Comelec hack - int'l tech security firm. CNN Philippines, 8 de abril de 2016.
Escher et al. v. Brazil. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs). Judgment of 6 de julio de 2009. Series C No. 200 (2009).
Fontevecchia and D'Amico v. Argentina. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Merits, Reparations and Costs). Judgment, I/A Court H.R., Series C No. 238 (2011).
Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja
González Case C-131/12 [ECR, 13 de mayo de 2014].
Ituango Massacres v. Colombia. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs). Judgment of 1 July 2006. Series C No. 148 (2006).
Kopp v. Switzerland (App No. 23224/94) [1998] ECHR 18.
Pretty v. United Kingdom (App 2346/02) [2002] ECHR 423.
Roman Zakharov v. Russia (App No. 47143/06) [2015] ECHR 1065.
Rotaru v. Romania (App No. 28341/95) [2000] ECHR 192.
S and Marper v United Kingdom (App nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04) [2008] ECHR 1581.
Tristán Donoso v. Panama. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs). Judgment of 27 January 2009. Series C No. 193 (2009).
Weltimmo s. r. o. v. Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Weltimmo v. Hungarian Data Protection Authority) Case C-230/14 [ECR, 30 de octobre de 2015].
Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v Austria (App no. 74336/01) [2007] ECHR 815.
Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
Regulation (EC) no 45/2001 of the of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the institutions and bodies of the Community and on the free movement of such data
Siguiente: Ejercicios
Volver al inicio