Base de datos de jurisprudencia

Trata de personas

Delitos

• Trata de personas (adultos)

Actos realizados

• Captación/contratación

Medios utilizados

• Amenaza del uso de la fuerzo u otras formas de coercion

Fines de explotación

• Explotación de la prostitución ajena u otras formas de explotación sexual

Case 0715

Resumen de los hechos

According to evidence presented in court and documents filed in connection with the case, Patel acknowledged that, in his role as the former owner of the Riviera Motel, he regularly rented rooms to individuals who are charged as sex trafficking co-conspirators in connection with this case, knowing they were pimps who forced and coerced women to engage in prostitution.  Patel admitted that although he never personally recruited, groomed, or coerced any of the victims, he benefited financially from the sex trafficking operation.

Evidence presented at the plea hearing and court documents establish that Patel would charge the pimps and sex trafficking co-conspirators higher rates than other motel guests, and would open the motel’s gate to allow the women to bring customers back to the hotel.  Patel learned that members of the sex trafficking conspiracy physically assaulted women they prostituted, including one instance in which a co-conspirator brutally beat one woman with a large piece of wood while she screamed for help, leaving her with multiple lacerations and what appeared to be a broken arm.  Patel also saw the damage that a co-conspirator caused to a motel room during a beating, including a broken toilet, a damaged sink, and blood on the walls. Patel agreed not to call the police after the co-conspirator paid him for the damage to the room.  Patel also knew that, in furtherance of the sex trafficking scheme, members of the sex trafficking conspiracy would take the women’s identification cards from them.  Patel saw the sex trafficking co-conspirators possessing the women’s identification cards and using them to rent hotels.  Patel did not report them to police as long as they paid their rent.  Five other defendants who personally recruited, groomed, and coerced the victims have also pleaded guilty to sex trafficking offenses in connection with the case.

Comentario y aspectos destacados

Patel is the first defendant in the United States to be convicted of a human trafficking offense solely based on the “benefiters” theory of criminal liability in the TVPA.

Fecha de la Sentencia:
2015-07-01
Autor:
U.S. Department of State

Palabras clave

Hechos:
Reclutamiento
Medio:
Amenaza o al uso de la fuerza u otras formas de coacción
Fines de explotación:
Explotación de la prostitución ajena u otras formas de explotación sexual

Cuestiones transversales

Responsabilidad

Responsabilidad por

• Delito consumado

Información sobre el procedimiento

Sistema jurídico:
Derecho anglosajón
Última sentencia judicial:
Tribunal de primera instancia
Tipo de Proceso:
Penal

1st Instance

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Date of decision: July 1, 2015

 
 

Víctima / Demandantes de primera instancia

Víctima:
Several Anonymous Women
Sexo:
Mujer

Acusado / Demandado de primera instancia

Número de otros acusados :
6
Acusado:
Kanubhai Patel
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
estadounidense
Edad:
74
Acusado:
Five other defendants

Cargos/Acusaciones/Decisiones

Acusado:
Kanubhai Patel
Detalles de cargos:
Benefitting Financially from Trafficking in Persons
Veredicto:
Guilty
Pena de prisión:
5 años
Acusado:
Five other defendants
Detalles de cargos:
Sex Trafficking
Veredicto:
Guilty

Tribunal

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana