Base de données Jurisprudence

Traite des personnes

Infractions

• Traite de personnes (adultes)

Actes commis

• Recrutement/embauche

Moyen

• La menace de recours ou le recours à la force ou d'autres formes de contrainte

Fins d’exploitation

• Exploitation de la prostitution d’autrui ou autres formes d’exploitation sexuelle

Case 0715

Résumé des faits

According to evidence presented in court and documents filed in connection with the case, Patel acknowledged that, in his role as the former owner of the Riviera Motel, he regularly rented rooms to individuals who are charged as sex trafficking co-conspirators in connection with this case, knowing they were pimps who forced and coerced women to engage in prostitution.  Patel admitted that although he never personally recruited, groomed, or coerced any of the victims, he benefited financially from the sex trafficking operation.

Evidence presented at the plea hearing and court documents establish that Patel would charge the pimps and sex trafficking co-conspirators higher rates than other motel guests, and would open the motel’s gate to allow the women to bring customers back to the hotel.  Patel learned that members of the sex trafficking conspiracy physically assaulted women they prostituted, including one instance in which a co-conspirator brutally beat one woman with a large piece of wood while she screamed for help, leaving her with multiple lacerations and what appeared to be a broken arm.  Patel also saw the damage that a co-conspirator caused to a motel room during a beating, including a broken toilet, a damaged sink, and blood on the walls. Patel agreed not to call the police after the co-conspirator paid him for the damage to the room.  Patel also knew that, in furtherance of the sex trafficking scheme, members of the sex trafficking conspiracy would take the women’s identification cards from them.  Patel saw the sex trafficking co-conspirators possessing the women’s identification cards and using them to rent hotels.  Patel did not report them to police as long as they paid their rent.  Five other defendants who personally recruited, groomed, and coerced the victims have also pleaded guilty to sex trafficking offenses in connection with the case.

Commentaire / Faits marquants

Patel is the first defendant in the United States to be convicted of a human trafficking offense solely based on the “benefiters” theory of criminal liability in the TVPA.

Date de la peine:
2015-07-01
Auteur:
U.S. Department of State

Mots-clefs

Actes:
Recrutement
Moyens:
Menace de recours ou le recours à la force ou à d'autres formes de contrainte
Fins d’exploitation:
Exploitation de la prostitution d’autrui ou d’autres formes d’exploitation sexuelle,

Questions transversales

Responsabilité

Responsabilité pour

• Infraction consommée

Informations sur la procédure

Système juridique:
Droit commun
Décision judiciaire la plus récente:
Tribunal de première instance
Type d'Action Juridique:
Criminel / pénal

1st Instance

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Date of decision: July 1, 2015

 
 

Victime / Demandeurs de la première instance

Victime:
Several Anonymous Women
Sexe:
Femme

Défendeurs / Répondants de la première instance

Nombre d'autres accusés:
6
Prévenu:
Kanubhai Patel
Sexe:
Homme
Nationalité:
Américain
Ancienneté:
74
Prévenu:
Five other defendants

Accusations / Demandes d’indemnité / Décisions

Prévenu:
Kanubhai Patel
Détails de charges:
Benefitting Financially from Trafficking in Persons
Verdict:
Guilty
Peine de prison:
5 ans
Prévenu:
Five other defendants
Détails de charges:
Sex Trafficking
Verdict:
Guilty

Tribunal

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana